Sunday, October 6, 2013

Marxist Calorie Rations: Food For Everyone

Marxist Calorie Rations: Food For Everyone

So I had this crazy idea. What if, in a communist/socialist society*, we rationed food with a calorie system? Your daily calorie allowance would be determined with a chart:
There could be more categories too, like for very active people and such. This was the easiest chart to copy. Every member of a household would have a daily caloric allowance. All those daily allowances would be added up, and then multiplied by 365. That would provide for a yearly caloric allowance. Every household would be issued a calorie debit card (extra copies are of course allowed). The total calorie allowance would only be released 1/12th or one month at a time, to prevent people from splurging then going hungry. Unused calories wouldn't expire from month to month. Maybe they might at the end of the year, but I haven't really decided that just yet. That could be put to vote, perhaps.

So for example, a "typical" family of four; mother (35), father (37), girl (12), and boy (8), all with a moderate activity level; (yes I know, I'm being horribly stereotypical, but bear with me for the sake of the example) would have a respective daily caloric allowance of 2000 cal, 2600 cal, 2000 cal, and 1600 cal, for a total of 8200 daily household calories. Multiplied by 365, that's an annual household caloric allowance of 2,993,000 calories. As the calories would be released monthly, the family would get 249,417 calories added to the debit card every month. The family would then be free to spend or save those calories however they choose. Healthier, lower-calorie food would be a more efficient use of the calorie allowance, however that does not preclude the family from choosing less healthy, higher-calorie food. They just don't get as much food when doing that, providing an incentive, but not an outright mandate, to eat healthier.

This would drastically cut health costs for the society. A healthier society (from eating better) would have less health costs. Obesity would be practically eliminated (barring health conditions). The only way to get more food than your allotted calories would be to become more active, and the health benefits of exercise are well-published. You could also have a generous friend, willing to host dinner, but that is likely to result in your having to host dinner at a later date. Applications for increased caloric limits could potentially be filed and reviewed on a case-by case basis. Nobody would starve while waiting for an expanded limit, since nobody will starve on 1500+ calories (but maybe feel a little hungry). After the first year of implementation, a popular vote could be taken to assess if this really is enough food.

In this system, I could still buy a bottle of truffle oil. I might want to buy a smaller bottle, since oil is high-caloric and I don't use a lot of truffle oil. However, truffle oil is in fairly short supply and is not cheap or especially easy to produce (I could be wrong and truffle oil is expensive for completely overblown reasons- I don't claim to be a truffle oil expert. This is just an example of something that's fairly expensive and really unnecessary, but delicious). So for every expensive item, like truffle oil, (or maybe every item, if that proves to be a good idea) a limit would be set. If there are 120 cal in 1 Tbsp (serving) of truffle oil, and each serving of truffle oil is about $1 in the current economy, truffle oil is freaking expensive. An (arbitrary) annual limit would have to be set. Say the governing body determines that 15 servings of truffle oil is the absolute maximum. But 10 servings is even better, just because it's so expensive. That's a limit of 1200 truffle oil calories per year (10 servings). I could go nuts and use that all in the first week of the year, or I could space that out. Or I could say I don't really care about truffle oil and not get any. But if I really like truffle oil that much, then I could get an extra five servings, for a total of 15. But my extra 5 servings would cost double the calories. So If I got all 15 servings of truffle oil, I would spend 2400 calories altogether. Which is more than an entire day's worth of food for me. Still expensive, but now it is at least accessible to everyone.

The nitty gritty details of this food rationing plan would have to be hashed out by a government committee, then put to popular vote as a final plan, to accept or revise. It would take many years of research and planning and possibly also experimentation before such a drastic plan could ever be implemented. But I am reveling in my self-perceived genius moment for hatching it. People say capitalism is the best system we have. But I disagree. I think that if you really work on it, everyone everywhere, a better system can arise. I'm probably not the first person to think of something like this. Or maybe I am. I don't know. Burgeoning Marxist societies: feel free to steal this idea from me. Just maybe put my name somewhere in the footnotes. This is only one of the many many pieces in the great puzzle that is putting together a better society. And it might not be perfect. There are a lot of other things that go into this. But I believe it is better.


*Yes, I'm a Marxist. More on this later.

4 comments:

  1. Ah, to be a free thinker in college again! What fun! Your idea would make a great health tracking system. Imagine an iPhone app that tracks your consumption and posts your results. More than just calorie tracking it can track your needed grams of various nutrients, vitamins, etc, a breakdown from the higher tier of food groups. You can balance not only energy intake but nutrition. The app would plot your physical activity (wifi sync'd activity meter on your body) and various food intake curves. You might even discover a link between your apparent energy level and dairy or gluten intake and discover a better diet for you. Individuals can compete with friends and challenge others to a score contest. At a macro level think of how a society can improve health and decrease healthcare costs and food assistance costs.
    As for the Marxist bit, I think Marxism isn't winning many supporters these days after several failed attempts to make it work over the long term. It is difficult to determine one's "ability" and "need" - I can't determine it myself, and I know I don't trust a political party or commune leaders to determine it for me. I have seen, and you may have, in socialistic countries that effort becomes not limited by ability but by what is received in return. Why produce surplus labor for no additional return in benefit for me? In theory it is good for the community, but in practice, it becomes a damper on enterprise, and the pace of progress is slow. This is why communist countries have abandoned Marxism for a blend of capitalism with social welfare controls. And so far, I think Norway is the only country I've seen that has a chance of making it work, due to its vast wealth of natural resources to make up for the deficit spending a socialistic government creates. France is nearly as socialistic but has even greater ability to produce, but has far less opportunity to pay for a socialistic welfare system; it lacks the cash cow of natural resources.
    So leave the Marxist scheming aside for the moment and look again at your idea of allocating and accounting for food, and I think you may have hit on a winning idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is about reforming Marxism as we know it. Certainly not saying this is the future. But if the practice of Marxism is flawed, can we make it better and how? There isn't enough empirical data to say that Marxism is innately flawed and will never work. History is a long time, and Marxism has only been a tiny blip on the radar, so to speak. Theories of governance are incredibly vague, leaving so much of how to actually do it up to interpretation. I'm trying to interpret Marxism in a novel way. It will always be controversial, there's no escaping that. I just want to try to improve upon some of the ideas associated with Marxism.

      And as far as the app thing goes, it could be interesting. Not entirely sure what you mean though. A calorie debit card synced to the app? Or are you logging calories and nutrition facts manually? Because that gets old really quick. Please feel free to expand upon your idea!

      Delete
  2. Can i get a Calorie Bonus for Thanksgiving an Christmas? What about Easter? Lief Erikson Day!? KWANZA!?!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great idea! Yes! I love new things that I haven't thought of. This is why one person shouldn't do all the thinking.

      Delete